Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Qwen3-4B
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.8 to 29.7.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1417 | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen3-4B?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen3-4B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.