Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.4

Rank #245 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 41.6.
  • Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
ProviderBaiduAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.833.4
Released—2024-09-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—29K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.66
Output $ / M tokens—$1
Results tracked2031

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Coding14551276
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9%
Aider Polyglot—16.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct—49%
LiveBench Coding—56.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—58%
HumanEval+—87.2%
MBPP+—77%

Reasoning Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts14451251
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning—42.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—49.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—119.49
HellaSwag—83%
LiveBench—46.2%
WinoGrande—80.8%

Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Math14371251
LiveBench Math—46.6%
GSM8K—93%

Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Expert14281221
ARC (AI2) Challenge—70.5%
MMLU—79.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Non-English14361205
LMArena Chinese15121222
LMArena Russian14461228
LMArena French1467—
LMArena German1460—
LMArena Japanese1382—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Instruction Following14131223
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.7%

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Longer Query14221251

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Text14451230
LMArena Creative Writing14261174
LMArena Multi-Turn14341222
LiveBench Language—23.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper