Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Mercury 2.5
ERNIE 5.0 0110 has enough public results to be ranked (#129); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 36.5 to 22.4.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 30.2 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 260K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.04 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 301.65 |
Reasoning Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | — |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Mercury 2.5: 22.4
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena German | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Mercury 2.5?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 has enough public results to be ranked (#129); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Mercury 2.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 2.