Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs ERNIE 5.0 0110

Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic

68.6

Rank #3 Confirmed

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher in 9 categories and ERNIE 5.0 0110 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 5.5 leads 80.2 to 17.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 88.5% for Claude Opus 5.5 and 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5ERNIE 5.0 0110
ProviderAnthropicBaidu
Noometry Index68.641.8
Released2026-09-22—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$4—
Output $ / M tokens$20—
Results tracked4420

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 71.9 (#3), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Coding15471455
FrontierCode54.6%—
CursorBench57.8%—
LMArena WebDev1813—
FrontierSWE62.3%—
SciCode66.9%—
MirrorCode77.4%—
ALE-Bench2,147—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 45.3 (#15), ERNIE 5.0 0110: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5ERNIE 5.0 0110
APEX-Agents73.5%—
GDP.pdf30.6%—
Vending-Bench 29,235—

Reasoning Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 80.2 (#3), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5ERNIE 5.0 0110
NYT Connections (extended)88.5%10.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts15351445
ARC-AGI-293.3%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
Thematic Generalization—41.7%
EBR-Bench71.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles71%—
DTBench98.9%—
LMCA68.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index167.33—

Math Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 91.8 (#3), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Math15061437
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)91.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 495%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 66.4 (#10), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Expert15471428
GPQA Diamond90.6%—
SimpleQA Verified72.2%—

Multimodal Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 57.8 (#1), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Vision13211249
Blueprint-Bench 251.2%—
Furniture Assembly83.3%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 59.1 (#2), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Non-English15071436
LMArena Chinese15881512
LMArena French15141467
LMArena Russian15201446
LMArena Spanish15071473
LMArena German—1460
LMArena Japanese—1382
LMArena Korean—1406

Instruction Following Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 80.0 (#3), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Instruction Following15371413

Long Context Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 47.1 (#19), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Longer Query15321422

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 78.2 (#3), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Text15151445
LMArena Creative Writing15331426
LMArena Multi-Turn14991434
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2050—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?

Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 or ERNIE 5.0 0110 better for coding?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 71.9 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5.5 and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5.5 has 44 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper