Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Llama 3.2 90B
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 36.5 to 10.4.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena German | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Llama 3.2 90B?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Llama 3.2 90B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.