Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Llama 3.1-70B

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Llama 3.1-70B Meta

29.6

Rank #308 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3.1-70B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 35.4.
  • Llama 3.1-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Llama 3.1-70B specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3.1-70B
ProviderBaiduMeta
Noometry Index41.829.6
Released—2024-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked2035

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Coding14551260
WeirdML—9%
BigCodeBench Instruct—46.1%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3.1-70B
TheAgentCompany—6.9%
BALROG—27.9%

Reasoning Llama 3.1-70B leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts14451241
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
DTBench—60%
LMCA—14.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.92

Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Math14371252
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.6%
Omni-MATH—21%
MATH Level 5—36.7%

Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Expert14281209
GPQA Diamond—44.2%
MMLU-Pro—65.3%
GPQA (HELM)—42.6%
MMLU—80.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Llama 3.1-70B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Non-English14361219
LMArena Chinese15121215
LMArena French14671261
LMArena German14601222
LMArena Japanese13821132
LMArena Korean14061140
LMArena Russian14461234
LMArena Spanish14731253

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Instruction Following14131231
IFEval—82.1%

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Longer Query14221241

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Text14451261
LMArena Creative Writing14261232
LMArena Multi-Turn14341256
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—784
WildBench—75.8%

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Llama 3.1-70B?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Llama 3.1-70B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Llama 3.1-70B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-70B has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper