Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Llama 2-13B
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
MetaSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 29.8.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 2-13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 29.6 |
| Released | — | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1062 |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1051 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 106.17 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1065 |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Llama 2-13B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1044 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1087 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1045 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1064 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1050 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Llama 2-13B?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Llama 2-13B better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Llama 2-13B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.