Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Gemma 2B
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 2B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 24.1.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 29.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1010 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |
Reasoning Gemma 2B leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 989 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 93.57 |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1009 |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| MMLU | — | 42.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 937 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena German | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 971 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 981 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 986 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 945 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Gemma 2B?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Gemma 2B better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Gemma 2B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.