Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Llama 13b
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
MetaSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 13.8.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 24.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 683 |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 728 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 781 |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Llama 13b?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Llama 13b better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Llama 13b share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.