Model comparison
Granite 4.2 30b vs Llama 13b
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 53.8 to 13.8.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 30b | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 24.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | 683 |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 781 |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | — |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Llama 13b?
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.2 30b or Llama 13b better for coding?
Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Llama 13b share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.