Model comparison
Claude 2 vs ERNIE 5.0 0110
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 39.3 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1455 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Claude 2 leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 10.3% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1445 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1437 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1428 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1249 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1512 |
| LMArena French | — | 1467 |
| LMArena German | — | 1460 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1473 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1413 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1422 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1426 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1434 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.