Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 5 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 31.4 to 16.3.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 45.4 |
| Released | — | 2025-11-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1428 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1439 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1462 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | 1356 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1329 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1407 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1403 |
Long Context Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1373 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1414 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.