Model comparison

Grok-3 mini vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.2

Rank #141 Confirmed

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo Moonshot AI

45.8

Rank #70 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 2 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 32.5 to 13.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 76.3% for Grok-3 mini and 84.2% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo.
  • Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-3 mini and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo specifications
Grok-3 miniKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
ProviderxAIMoonshot AI
Noometry Index41.245.8
Released2025-04-092025-11-06
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3521

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Coding13791454
Aider Polyglot49.3%—
LMArena WebDev—1322
WeirdML42.6%—

Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Hard Prompts13751428
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-116.5%—
Chess Puzzles—20%
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35—

Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%83.1%
LMArena Math13861429
Omni-MATH31.8%—
MATH Level 590.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—

Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
GPQA Diamond76.3%84.2%
LMArena Expert13951439
MMLU-Pro79.9%—
Confabulations10.8%—
GPQA (HELM)67.5%—

Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Non-English13521398
LMArena Chinese13871456
LMArena French13571425
LMArena German13491390
LMArena Japanese13421357
LMArena Korean13351330
LMArena Russian13531391
LMArena Spanish13811406

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Instruction Following13571403
IFEval95.1%—

Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Longer Query13721415
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Text13701415
LMArena Creative Writing13421374
LMArena Multi-Turn13551414
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
WildBench65.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-3 mini better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-3 mini or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper