Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 9 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 17.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 89.6% for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ProviderBaiduxAI
Noometry Index41.846.2
Released—2026-03-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked2020

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Coding14551457

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Search—1204

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%89.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14451448
Thematic Generalization41.7%—

Math Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Math14371442

Knowledge Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Expert14281445

Multimodal Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Vision12491259

Multilingual Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Non-English14361440
LMArena Chinese15121475
LMArena French14671466
LMArena German14601456
LMArena Japanese13821405
LMArena Korean14061416
LMArena Russian14461457
LMArena Spanish14731447

Instruction Following Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Instruction Following14131420

Long Context Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Longer Query14221431

Writing & Preference Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Text14451450
LMArena Creative Writing14261436
LMArena Multi-Turn14341452

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.0 vs 43.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper