Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Inkling-Small

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #63 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 5 categories and Inkling-Small in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling-Small leads 38.6 to 17.0.
  • Inkling-Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Inkling-Small specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Inkling-Small
ProviderBaiduThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index41.846.5
Released—2026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—524K
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$0.45
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked2033

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Inkling-Small
LMArena Coding14551451
LMArena WebDev—1409
SciCode—48.7%

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Inkling-Small
LMArena Hard Prompts14451423
ARC-AGI-2—40.1%
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
ARC-AGI-1—84%
CritPt—8.3%
Chess Puzzles—18%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—150.15

Math Inkling-Small leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Inkling-Small
LMArena Math14371459
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—46.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—90%
ProofBench—6%

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Inkling-Small
LMArena Expert14281442
GPQA Diamond—88.5%
SimpleQA Verified—19.1%

Multimodal Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Inkling-Small
LMArena Vision12491235

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Inkling-Small
LMArena Non-English14361402
LMArena Chinese15121465
LMArena French14671436
LMArena German14601405
LMArena Japanese13821405
LMArena Korean14061363
LMArena Russian14461391
LMArena Spanish14731428

Instruction Following Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Inkling-Small
LMArena Instruction Following14131399

Long Context Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Inkling-Small
LMArena Longer Query14221401

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Inkling-Small
LMArena Text14451414
LMArena Creative Writing14261331
LMArena Multi-Turn14341418
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1491

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Inkling-Small?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Inkling-Small better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.0 vs 43.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Inkling-Small share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper