Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs GLM-5

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

GLM-5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

46.1

Rank #66 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 1 category and GLM-5 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5 leads 52.3 to 39.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 74.8% for GLM-5.
  • GLM-5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5
ProviderBaiduZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index41.846.1
Released—2026-02-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$3.20
Results tracked2045

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), GLM-5: 49.0 (#52)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5
LMArena Coding14551461
SWE-bench Verified—72.1%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—72.8%
LMArena WebDev—1434
SWE-bench Multilingual—69.7%
WeirdML—48.2%
ALE-Bench—765.62

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, GLM-5: 31.1 (#71)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5
Terminal-Bench—52.4%
τ²-bench Airline—82.5%
τ²-bench Banking—9.8%
τ²-bench Retail—73.7%
τ²-bench Telecom—86.8%
Vending-Bench 2—4,432

Reasoning GLM-5 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), GLM-5: 27.6 (#116)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%74.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts14451452
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
SimpleBench—53.2%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—75%
ARC-AGI-1—44.7%
Chess Puzzles—10%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.83
ForecastBench—61

Math GLM-5 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), GLM-5: 46.4 (#71)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5
LMArena Math14371440
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—65.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—80%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—16.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge GLM-5 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), GLM-5: 52.3 (#64)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5
LMArena Expert14281454
GPQA Diamond—87.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), GLM-5: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), GLM-5: 53.7 (#58)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5
LMArena Non-English14361430
LMArena Chinese15121511
LMArena French14671455
LMArena German14601445
LMArena Japanese13821416
LMArena Korean14061423
LMArena Russian14461436
LMArena Spanish14731454

Instruction Following Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), GLM-5: 75.2 (#67)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5
LMArena Instruction Following14131428

Long Context GLM-5 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), GLM-5: 44.7 (#60)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5
LMArena Longer Query14221446
CL-bench—18.7%

Writing & Preference GLM-5 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), GLM-5: 66.0 (#38)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5
LMArena Text14451446
LMArena Creative Writing14261439
LMArena Multi-Turn14341456
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1601

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than GLM-5?

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or GLM-5 better for coding?

GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GLM-5 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5 has 45.

Related comparisons

Go deeper