Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Yi-1.5-34B
Yi-1.5-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Yi-1.5-34B leads 37.4 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-1.5-34B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1160 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Too close to call
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Yi-1.5-34B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1213 |
| LMArena French | — | 1156 |
| LMArena German | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1121 |
Instruction Following Yi-1.5-34B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1139 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1143 |
Writing & Preference Yi-1.5-34B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Yi-1.5-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
Yi-1.5-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Yi-1.5-34B share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.