Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Yi-1.5-34B

Yi-1.5-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.7

Rank #333 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.2

Rank #286 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 4 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Yi-1.5-34B leads 25.3 to 9.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 14.9% for Claude 3 Haiku and 25.5% for Yi-1.5-34B.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Haiku and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
Claude 3 HaikuYi-1.5-34B
ProviderAnthropic01.AI
Noometry Index25.730.2
Released2024-03-072024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Yi-1.5-34B leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.1 (#320), Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuYi-1.5-34B
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%33.9%
LMArena Coding11991169
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%43.8%
WeirdML9.8%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 15.7 (#303), Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts11741160
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.3—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Yi-1.5-34B leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.2 (#313), Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math11881182
MATH Level 514.9%25.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—

Knowledge Claude 3 Haiku leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#280), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuYi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond36.3%32%
LMArena Expert11481144
Confabulations34.2%—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.1 (#123), Yi-1.5-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Claude 3 Haiku leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#238), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English11781121
LMArena Chinese11551213
LMArena French11941155
LMArena German11741111
LMArena Japanese11021021
LMArena Korean11081005
LMArena Russian12041091
LMArena Spanish11651120

Instruction Following Claude 3 Haiku leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.5 (#242), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following11741139

Long Context Claude 3 Haiku leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#232), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query11911144

Writing & Preference Yi-1.5-34B leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.8 (#286), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text11951173
LMArena Creative Writing11571135
LMArena Multi-Turn11901153
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Yi-1.5-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Yi-1.5-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Yi-1.5-34B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper