Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Kimi K2.6
Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.6 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.6 leads 68.5 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 47.7 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2026-04-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.95 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 51 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.6 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Kimi K2.6: 50.7 (#43)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1488 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1509 |
| SciCode | — | 53.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 55.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,093 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Kimi K2.6: 21.9 (#137)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 12% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,205 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Kimi K2.6: 40.5 (#55)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1470 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | 151.05 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.2% |
| CritPt | — | 8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 2.4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 90.9% |
| LMCA | — | 37.3% |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Kimi K2.6 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Kimi K2.6: 57.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1475 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 25.6% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 72.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 96.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Kimi K2.6: 54.0 (#54)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1491 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Kimi K2.6: 31.6 (#103)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1283 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 3.9% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 21.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1451 |
Multilingual Kimi K2.6 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Kimi K2.6: 54.9 (#37)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1446 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1521 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena German | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1443 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1464 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.6 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Kimi K2.6: 76.3 (#43)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1451 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1468 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.6 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Kimi K2.6: 68.5 (#26)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1434 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1453 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1725 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1202 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Kimi K2.6?
Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?
Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.7 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Kimi K2.6 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.