Model comparison

Dolly 2.0-12b vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

24.9

Rank #339 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.1

Rank #36 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 64.0 to 15.3.
  • Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Dolly 2.0-12b and Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications
Dolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderDatabricksAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index24.951.1
Released2023-04-112026-04-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.30
Output $ / M tokens—$7.80
Results tracked1729

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.6 (#50)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Coding7761472
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 40.8 (#47)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts8041457
Epoch Capabilities Index88.94149.27
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
HellaSwag70.8%—
PIQA75.4%—
WinoGrande61.8%—

Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 52.2 (#40)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Math8711465
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#35)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Max Preview
GPQA Diamond—87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%
LMArena Expert—1476
ARC (AI2) Challenge39.6%—
BoolQ56.3%—
MMLU26.2%—
OpenBookQA39.2%—

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.3 (#46)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English8361436
LMArena Chinese8361487
LMArena French—1449
LMArena Russian—1444
LMArena Spanish—1452

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.8 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following8141437

Long Context Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#59)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1457

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 64.0 (#58)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text8511447
LMArena Creative Writing8641435
LMArena Multi-Turn7401456

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper