Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.2 Pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 27.3.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 52.3 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $168 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | 155.4 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| LMArena Math | 871 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.