Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Dolly 2.0-12b
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 27.3.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Dolly 2.0-12b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Databricks |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 25.5 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2023-04-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 776 |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 804 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 89.67 |
| HellaSwag | — | 70.8% |
| PIQA | — | 75.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 61.8% |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 871 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Dolly 2.0-12b: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 39.6% |
| BoolQ | — | 56.3% |
| MMLU | — | 26.2% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 39.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Dolly 2.0-12b: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 836 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 836 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 814 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 851 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 864 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 740 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Dolly 2.0-12b?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Dolly 2.0-12b better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Dolly 2.0-12b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Dolly 2.0-12b has 17.