Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 45.2 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1503 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1479 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1488 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1481 |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1503 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1471 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1477 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1483 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.