Model comparison

Dolly 2.0-12b vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

25.5

Rank #342 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.9 to 27.3.

Side by side

Dolly 2.0-12b and Kimi K2.7 Code specifications
Dolly 2.0-12bKimi K2.7 Code
ProviderDatabricksMoonshot AI
Noometry Index25.543.3
Released2023-04-112026-06-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked1719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K2.7 Code
DeepSWE—30.5%
FrontierCode—30.1%
LMArena WebDev—1473
SciCode—47.5%
WeirdML—54.1%
LMArena Coding776—
ALE-Bench—886.23

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents—37.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—5,083

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K2.7 Code
Epoch Capabilities Index89.67149.97
SimpleBench—57.9%
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts804—
Surface Evolver Bench—48.8%
HellaSwag70.8%—
PIQA75.4%—
WinoGrande61.8%—

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—54%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
LMArena Math871—

Knowledge Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
SimpleQA Verified—36.5%
ARC (AI2) Challenge39.6%—
BoolQ56.3%—
MMLU26.2%—
OpenBookQA39.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English836—
LMArena Chinese836—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Instruction Following814—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text851—
LMArena Creative Writing864—
LMArena Multi-Turn740—

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper