Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 9B Google

25.9

Rank #341 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 9.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.6% for Gemma 2 9B and 95.6% for Kimi K2.7 Code.

Side by side

Gemma 2 9BKimi K2.7 Code
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Noometry Index25.943.3
Released2024-06-242026-06-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked3519

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

BenchmarkGemma 2 9BKimi K2.7 Code
DeepSWE—30.5%
FrontierCode—30.1%
LMArena WebDev—1473
SciCode—47.5%
WeirdML—54.1%
BigCodeBench Instruct34.7%—
LiveBench Coding22.5%—
LMArena Coding1173—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—
ALE-Bench—886.23

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2 9B: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

BenchmarkGemma 2 9BKimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents—37.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—5,083

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

BenchmarkGemma 2 9BKimi K2.7 Code
Epoch Capabilities Index119.83149.97
SimpleBench—57.9%
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LiveBench Reasoning15.2%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1171—
LiveBench Data Analysis36.4%—
Surface Evolver Bench—48.8%
LiveBench28.7%—
PIQA83.7%—

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

BenchmarkGemma 2 9BKimi K2.7 Code
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.6%95.6%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—54%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
LiveBench Math19.8%—
LMArena Math1183—
MATH Level 521%—
GSM8K84.9%—

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

BenchmarkGemma 2 9BKimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond27.5%87.9%
SimpleQA Verified—36.5%
LMArena Expert1147—
BoolQ85.7%—
MMLU72.1%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkGemma 2 9BKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English1188—
LMArena Chinese1185—
LMArena French1190—
LMArena German1186—
LMArena Japanese1144—
LMArena Korean1137—
LMArena Russian1200—
LMArena Spanish1200—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkGemma 2 9BKimi K2.7 Code
LiveBench Instruction Following52.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1178—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkGemma 2 9BKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Longer Query1197—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkGemma 2 9BKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text1207—
LMArena Creative Writing1206—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing841—
LMArena Multi-Turn1193—
LiveBench Language25.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 9B better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 9B or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper