Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.6 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 43.4 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1469 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1450 |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1460 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1468 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1416 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1434 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1445 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and MiMo-V2.5 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.