Model comparison

Dolly 2.0-12b vs Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

25.5

Rank #342 Confirmed

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.0 to 15.2.
  • Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Dolly 2.0-12b and Grok 4.7 specifications
Dolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.7
ProviderDatabricksxAI
Noometry Index25.553.1
Released2023-04-112026-09-21
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1739

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.7
LMArena Coding7761427
FrontierCode—47.6%
CursorBench—46.3%
LMArena WebDev—1639
FrontierSWE—29.5%
SciCode—57.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.7
APEX-Agents—54.6%
GDP.pdf—22.8%
Vending-Bench 2—10,537

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.7
LMArena Hard Prompts8041413
Epoch Capabilities Index89.67153.53
NYT Connections (extended)—76.8%
CritPt—18%
Chess Puzzles—38%
Mystery Game Puzzles—29%
DTBench—96%
LMCA—49.4%
HellaSwag70.8%—
PIQA75.4%—
WinoGrande61.8%—

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.7
LMArena Math8711407
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—53%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—98.1%
ProofBench—34%

Knowledge Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.7
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—56%
LMArena Expert—1422
ARC (AI2) Challenge39.6%—
BoolQ56.3%—
MMLU26.2%—
OpenBookQA39.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.7
LMArena Vision—1228
Blueprint-Bench 2—32.5%
Furniture Assembly—20.8%

Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.7
LMArena Non-English8361389
LMArena Chinese8361455
LMArena French—1455
LMArena Russian—1397
LMArena Spanish—1400

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following8141404

Long Context Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.7
LMArena Longer Query—1413

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bGrok 4.7
LMArena Text8511399
LMArena Creative Writing8641391
LMArena Multi-Turn7401393
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2007

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Grok 4.7 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper