Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs GPT-5.2 Pro

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

52.3

Rank #39 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.2 Pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 9.8.

Side by side

Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-5.2 Pro specifications
Claude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Pro
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index25.952.3
Released2024-03-072025-12-11
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$21
Output $ / M tokens—$168
Results tracked378

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Pro
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
LMArena Coding1199—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Pro
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35155.4
ARC-AGI-2—54.2%
SimpleBench—57.4%
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)—79.3%
ARC-AGI-1—90.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts1174—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 514.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—31.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Pro
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
LMArena Expert1148—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Pro
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Pro
LMArena Non-English1178—
LMArena Chinese1155—
LMArena French1195—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1109—
LMArena Russian1204—
LMArena Spanish1166—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Pro
LMArena Instruction Following1173—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Pro
LMArena Longer Query1190—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Pro
LMArena Text1195—
LMArena Creative Writing1157—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—
LMArena Multi-Turn1190—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than GPT-5.2 Pro?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-5.2 Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.

Related comparisons

Go deeper