Model comparison
Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 35.1 to 9.8.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2024-03-07 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 37 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1199 | 1268 |
| WeirdML | 9.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.1% | — |
| CadEval | 12% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 68.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 68.8% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 34.2% | 31.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1174 | 1284 |
| DTBench | 50.1% | — |
| LMCA | 8.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.35 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.2 | — |
| WinoGrande | 74.2% | — |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1148 | 1246 |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 34.2% | — |
| MMLU | 73.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 950 | — |
| ScienceQA | 72% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1178 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1155 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1195 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1174 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1102 | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | 1109 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1204 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1166 | 1305 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1173 | 1255 |
Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1190 | 1276 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1195 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1157 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1276 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 717 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Haiku or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.