Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Wizardlm 70b
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 63.0 to 34.9.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1081 |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1079 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1275 | — |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1442 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1443 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1093 |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Wizardlm 70b?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.