Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Wizardlm 70b
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.4 to 34.9.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.6 | 32.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1419 | 1081 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1417 | 1079 |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1383 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1398 | 1093 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1405 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1389 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Wizardlm 70b?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.2 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Wizardlm 70b share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.