Model comparison

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B vs Wizardlm 70b

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

43.2

Rank #95 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads 60.2 to 34.8.

Side by side

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22BWizardlm 70b
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Microsoft
Noometry Index43.233.0
Released2025-04—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.70—
Output $ / M tokens$2.80—
Results tracked1812

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 42.4 (#100), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-VL 235B-A22BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding14391081

Reasoning Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 29.3 (#92), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-VL 235B-A22BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts14281079

Math Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.0 (#118), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-VL 235B-A22BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math14261116

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 40.3 (#121), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-VL 235B-A22BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Expert1442—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.8 (#55), Wizardlm 70b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-VL 235B-A22BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1247—

Multilingual Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 51.9 (#97), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-VL 235B-A22BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English14051078
LMArena Chinese14631052
LMArena German14241083
LMArena Russian14081155
LMArena French1452—
LMArena Japanese1385—
LMArena Korean1394—
LMArena Spanish1428—

Instruction Following Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.2 (#101), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-VL 235B-A22BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following14061093

Long Context Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#98), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-VL 235B-A22BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query14201097

Writing & Preference Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.2 (#99), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-VL 235B-A22BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text14201120
LMArena Creative Writing13661149
LMArena Multi-Turn14281108

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B better than Wizardlm 70b?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper