Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Pixtral Large
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
Mistral AISummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Pixtral Large in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 32.9.
- Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
- Seed 2.0 Pro accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
- Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | 128K |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | — |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | — |
Math Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
Multimodal Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | — |
| LMArena French | 1471 | — |
| LMArena German | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Pixtral Large?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Pixtral Large?
Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.
Which has the bigger context window?
Seed 2.0 Pro does, with 256K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Pixtral Large share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.