Model comparison

Pixtral Large vs Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Pixtral Large Mistral AI

31.7

Rank #257 Reported

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.5

Rank #98 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Pixtral Large scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads 60.4 to 32.9.
  • Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
  • Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Pixtral Large and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B specifications
Pixtral LargeQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.742.5
Released2024-11-012025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K131K
Max output128K33K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.70
Output $ / M tokens$6$2.80
Results tracked318

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Pixtral Large: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 41.8 (#103)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Coding—1438

Reasoning Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Pixtral Large: 20.9 (#208), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 28.1 (#92)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1428

Math Not comparable

Pixtral Large: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 36.2 (#120)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Math—1426

Knowledge Not comparable

Pixtral Large: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.6 (#120)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Expert—1440

Multimodal Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Pixtral Large: 30.0 (#105), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.1 (#50)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Vision10891247

Multilingual Not comparable

Pixtral Large: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 52.1 (#92)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Non-English—1405
LMArena Chinese—1462
LMArena French—1448
LMArena German—1424
LMArena Japanese—1385
LMArena Korean—1395
LMArena Russian—1409
LMArena Spanish—1427

Instruction Following Not comparable

Pixtral Large: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.4 (#95)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Instruction Following—1407

Long Context Not comparable

Pixtral Large: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#93)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Longer Query—1420

Writing & Preference Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#273), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.4 (#94)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral LargeQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Text—1420
LMArena Creative Writing—1367
EQ-Bench Creative Writing988—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1428

Frequently asked questions

Is Pixtral Large better than Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Pixtral Large or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Pixtral Large and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Pixtral Large has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper