Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Falcon-180B
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 63.0 to 29.3.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 31.8 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2023-09-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | — |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167), Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1007 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.89 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |
Math Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1275 | — |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37), Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1442 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | — |
| LMArena French | 1470 | — |
| LMArena German | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86), Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1047 |
Long Context Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66), Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1013 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Falcon-180B?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Falcon-180B share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.