Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 40.2 to 18.3.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | — |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1439 | — |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | — |
| LMArena French | 1471 | — |
| LMArena German | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.