Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 2B
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 2B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 24.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 29.6 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1010 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 989 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 94.2 |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1009 |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| MMLU | — | 42.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 937 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | — |
| LMArena German | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 970 |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 981 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 987 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 945 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 2B?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemma 2B better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Gemma 2B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.