Noometry

Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs Mistral Nemo

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 7.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

42.5

Rank #97 Confirmed

Mistral Nemo Mistral AI

25.9

Rank #332 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 63.0 to 28.6.
  • Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
  • Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 ProMistral Nemo
ProviderByteDance SeedMistral AI
Noometry Index42.525.9
Released2026-02-142024-07-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K128K
Max output128K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$3$0.15
Results tracked2010

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84), Mistral Nemo: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Nemo
LMArena Coding1472—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Nemo
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.6%
BALROG—17.6%

Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167), Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Nemo
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
Thematic Generalization57.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1453—
DTBench—48.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.63
PIQA—83.5%

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110), Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Nemo
LMArena Math1440—
MATH Level 5—10.8%
GSM8K—84.2%

Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Nemo
GPQA Diamond—29.9%
LMArena Expert1440—
BoolQ—82.5%

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34), Mistral Nemo: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Nemo
LMArena Vision1275—

Multilingual Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37), Mistral Nemo: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Nemo
LMArena Non-English1442—
LMArena Chinese1490—
LMArena French1470—
LMArena German1443—
LMArena Japanese1408—
LMArena Korean1412—
LMArena Russian1450—
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86), Mistral Nemo: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Nemo
LMArena Instruction Following1414—

Long Context Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85), Mistral Nemo: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Nemo
LMArena Longer Query1428—

Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66), Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMistral Nemo
LMArena Text1448—
LMArena Creative Writing1406—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—881
LMArena Multi-Turn1441—

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Mistral Nemo?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 7.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

Which has the bigger context window?

Seed 2.0 Pro does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Mistral Nemo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper