Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Mistral Nemo
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.4 to 28.6.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.6 | 25.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1419 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96), Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1417 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.63 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1383 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1398 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1405 | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95), Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1389 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Mistral Nemo?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.