Model comparison
Claude 3 Haiku vs Seed 2.0 Pro
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Seed 2.0 Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 29.7.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Haiku | Seed 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | ByteDance Seed |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 43.2 |
| Released | 2024-03-07 | 2026-02-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3 |
| Results tracked | 37 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1199 | 1472 |
| WeirdML | 9.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.1% | — |
| CadEval | 12% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 68.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 68.8% | — |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1174 | 1453 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 34.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 57.1% |
| DTBench | 50.1% | — |
| LMCA | 8.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.35 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.2 | — |
| WinoGrande | 74.2% | — |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1439 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1148 | 1440 |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 34.2% | — |
| MMLU | 73.8% | — |
Multimodal Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 950 | 1274 |
| ScienceQA | 72% | — |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1178 | 1441 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1155 | 1489 |
| LMArena French | 1195 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1174 | 1442 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1102 | 1408 |
| LMArena Korean | 1109 | 1411 |
| LMArena Russian | 1204 | 1449 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1166 | 1460 |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1173 | 1414 |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1190 | 1428 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1195 | 1448 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1157 | 1406 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1441 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 717 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Seed 2.0 Pro?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Haiku or Seed 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Seed 2.0 Pro share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Seed 2.0 Pro has 20.