Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Llama 3-70B
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
MetaSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 39.3 to 12.8.
- Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2024-04-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1206 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: —, Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 5% |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1195 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.93 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1218 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1149 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.6% |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Llama 3-70B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1232 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1241 |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1194 |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1174 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1223 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Llama 3-70B?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Llama 3-70B better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Llama 3-70B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.