Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Llama 3-70B

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus DeepSeek

42.6

Rank #96 Confirmed

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.5

Rank #317 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3-70B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads 35.7 to 12.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 81.3% for DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and 54.2% for Llama 3-70B.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Llama 3-70B specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLlama 3-70B
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Noometry Index42.628.5
Released2025-09-222024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1—
Results tracked1631

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 41.5 (#114), Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLlama 3-70B
LMArena Coding14261206
SciCode40.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.5%
ALE-Bench745.17—
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—69%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLlama 3-70B
Cybench—5%

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 25.7 (#126), Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLlama 3-70B
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%35.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts14271195
DTBench81.3%54.2%
CritPt1.7%—
LMCA28.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.91
ForecastBench—57.1
WinoGrande—83.5%

Math DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 35.7 (#138), Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLlama 3-70B
LMArena Math14021218
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.3%
MATH Level 5—22.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLlama 3-70B
GPQA Diamond—40.6%
LMArena Expert—1149
MMLU—79.3%

Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.3 (#87), Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLlama 3-70B
LMArena Non-English14071142
LMArena Russian14341159
LMArena Chinese—1114
LMArena French—1231
LMArena German—1169
LMArena Japanese—1017
LMArena Korean—1017
LMArena Spanish—1241

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.4 (#96), Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLlama 3-70B
LMArena Instruction Following14061194

Long Context DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.5 (#88), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLlama 3-70B
LMArena Longer Query14261174

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.3 (#87), Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLlama 3-70B
LMArena Text14201221
LMArena Creative Writing14041210
LMArena Multi-Turn14111223

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than Llama 3-70B?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Llama 3-70B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper