Model comparison

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Llama 3-70B

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 3-70B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.9 to 12.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 95.6% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 4.3% for Llama 3-70B.

Side by side

Kimi K2.7 Code and Llama 3-70B specifications
Kimi K2.7 CodeLlama 3-70B
ProviderMoonshot AIMeta
Noometry Index43.328.8
Released2026-06-122024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.95—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked1931

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 3-70B
DeepSWE30.5%—
FrontierCode30.1%—
LMArena WebDev1473—
SciCode47.5%—
WeirdML54.1%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.6%
LMArena Coding—1206
BigCodeBench Complete—54.5%
ALE-Bench886.23—
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—69%

Agentic & Tool Use Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122), Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 3-70B
APEX-Agents37.6%—
Cybench—5%
GBAEval0.9%—
Vending-Bench 25,083—

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 3-70B
Epoch Capabilities Index149.97122.93
SimpleBench57.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—35.1%
CritPt10%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1195
DTBench—54.2%
Surface Evolver Bench48.8%—
ForecastBench—57.1
WinoGrande—83.5%

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48), Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 3-70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%4.3%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)54%—
FrontierMath Tier 412.2%—
LMArena Math—1218
MATH Level 5—22.6%

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 3-70B
GPQA Diamond87.9%40.6%
SimpleQA Verified36.5%—
LMArena Expert—1149
MMLU—79.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 3-70B
LMArena Non-English—1142
LMArena Chinese—1114
LMArena French—1232
LMArena German—1169
LMArena Japanese—1017
LMArena Korean—1017
LMArena Russian—1159
LMArena Spanish—1241

Instruction Following Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 3-70B
LMArena Instruction Following—1194

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 3-70B
LMArena Longer Query—1174

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 3-70B
LMArena Text—1221
LMArena Creative Writing—1210
LMArena Multi-Turn—1223

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Llama 3-70B?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Llama 3-70B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper