Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 48.7.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1307 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1286 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1281 |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1276 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1266 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | — |
| LMArena German | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1277 |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1341 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1284 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.