Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 35.1.
  • Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Kimi K2.7 Code specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
ProviderTencentMoonshot AI
Noometry Index38.643.3
Released—2026-06-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked1219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
DeepSWE—30.5%
FrontierCode—30.1%
LMArena WebDev—1473
SciCode—47.5%
WeirdML—54.1%
LMArena Coding1307—
ALE-Bench—886.23

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents—37.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—5,083

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
SimpleBench—57.9%
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts1286—
Surface Evolver Bench—48.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.97

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—54%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
LMArena Math1281—

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
SimpleQA Verified—36.5%
LMArena Expert1276—

Multilingual Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English1265—
LMArena Chinese1346—
LMArena Russian1266—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Instruction Following1277—

Long Context Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Longer Query1341—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text1288—
LMArena Creative Writing1264—
LMArena Multi-Turn1284—

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper