Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 49.1.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1319 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1302 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1316 |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1273 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1275 |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.