Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 9 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 42.9 to 28.2.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 34.8 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2024-12-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1351 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 13.5% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 38.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 25.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 59.9% |
| CadEval | — | 30% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 11.4% |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1346 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 1.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 31.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 1.1% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 78.2% |
| DTBench | — | 63.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 69.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.36 |
| LiveBench | — | 66.9% |
Math Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1351 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 57.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 75.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 82.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1340 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 64.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 6.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 55.6% |
| MMLU | — | 79.7% |
Multimodal Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1275 | 1158 |
| GeoBench | — | 77% |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1442 | 1342 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | 1390 |
| LMArena German | 1443 | 1354 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1293 |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1351 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1363 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1336 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 85.8% |
| IFEval | — | 84.1% |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1345 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 61.1% |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1354 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1340 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1350 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1128 |
| WildBench | — | 80% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54.