Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs Magistral Medium

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

42.5

Rank #97 Confirmed

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

34.8

Rank #224 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Magistral Medium in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 63.0 to 46.5.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
  • Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 Pro and Magistral Medium specifications
Seed 2.0 ProMagistral Medium
ProviderByteDance SeedMistral AI
Noometry Index42.534.8
Released2026-02-142025-03-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K128K
Max output128K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$2
Output $ / M tokens$3$5
Results tracked2022

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84), Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Medium
LMArena Coding14721319
SciCode—39.2%

Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167), Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Medium
LMArena Hard Prompts14531267
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—16.2%
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
ARC-AGI-1—6.1%
CritPt—0.3%
Thematic Generalization57.1%—

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110), Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Medium
LMArena Math14401249

Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119), Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Medium
LMArena Expert14401222

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34), Magistral Medium: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Medium
LMArena Vision1275—

Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37), Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Medium
LMArena Non-English14421232
LMArena Chinese14901225
LMArena French14701268
LMArena German14431248
LMArena Japanese14081176
LMArena Korean14121125
LMArena Russian14501224
LMArena Spanish14601269

Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86), Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following14141254

Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85), Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query14281295

Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66), Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMagistral Medium
LMArena Text14481255
LMArena Creative Writing14061245
LMArena Multi-Turn14411275

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Magistral Medium?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Magistral Medium?

Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Magistral Medium better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Seed 2.0 Pro does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Magistral Medium share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper