Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 2 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 28.9 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1418 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1416 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1180 |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1397 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1404 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1422 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.