Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Falcon-180B
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 46.0 to 29.1.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Falcon-180B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | 2023-09-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1007 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.13 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1000 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1047 |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1089 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1013 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Falcon-180B?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Falcon-180B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.